Also, how to maintain your tech backups.
Continue reading the main story
Ad
California Today

January 16, 2020

Jorge Sanjuan, right, an interviewer from the Center for Rural Affairs, doing a survey on the upcoming census at the El Rematito flea market in Modesto. Max Whittaker for The New York Times

Good morning.

(Here’s the sign-up, if you don’t already get California Today delivered to your inbox.)

We’ve known for a while that California’s population growth has slowed to historic lows in recent years as immigration has dwindled and birthrates have plummeted.

That’s true for some states across the country and the country as a whole.

But it’s not true for every state. As my colleague Robert Gebeloff reported, some states, like Texas, grew rapidly over the 2010s.

And that, experts say, could result in California losing a congressional seat for the first time in history.

[Read more about why some states are growing, stalling or shrinking.]

According to an analysis from the Brookings Institution, California is projected to lose one representative, while Texas is slated to gain three in the next round of reapportionment, which will follow the 2020 census.

I called Eric McGhee, a political participation expert with the Public Policy Institute of California, and Karin MacDonald, who was the principal technical consultant to the state’s redistricting commission in 2011, to talk about how the process actually works.

So this is tied to the census? The same census that the state is worried undocumented immigrants or their families will be afraid to participate in?

In short, Mr. McGhee told me, yes. Reapportionment is directly tied to the decennial census.

As the law stands now, the seats are supposed to reflect the entire population of each district — not just U.S. citizens — and there won’t be a question about citizenship.

But Mr. McGhee said there’s still lingering concern that California’s population could be undercounted.

On the other hand, even if you based your projections on the 2010 census — “which was by all accounts a pretty good census,” he said — California might still be on track to lose.

As far as we know, California, unlike, say, West Virginia, hasn’t actually lost residents. The state’s still growing a little. Why are we on track to lose a seat?

“It’s a zero-sum game,” Mr. McGhee said. “So your state can grow — California has grown in population — but not grow enough compared to other states and lose out as a result.”

It wasn’t always this way, he said. For much of American history, seats were added without a limit.

“So it was like, ‘You get a seat, and you get a seat!’” Mr. McGhee said.

That Oprah-like approach continued until 1911, when the number was capped at 435. Still, California kept growing, which meant that the state continued to gain seats, even as others lost them.

But in 2011, the state’s 53 representatives stayed flat for the first time.

Mr. McGhee said that, relatively speaking, there most likely will be little reshuffling this time around, since population growth at the national level has slowed. But California is still likely at risk.

So, say the census goes perfectly and California still loses a seat. What happens then?

The census always takes place during years ending in zero. And redistricting, the process of deciding how to draw the boundaries of all legislative districts, happens the year after that — regardless of whether the number of seats has changed.

Continue reading the main story

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

In 2011, as a way of trying to remove partisan influence over the process, the state enlisted an independent, nonpartisan citizens commission to redraw the lines.

Ms. MacDonald said the commission’s top priority was to ensure that the population of each district was equal. Then, she said, the commission was told to keep cities and counties in the same district as much as possible. Another criterion was keeping “communities of interest” intact, which involved gathering public input from around the state.

According to a ProPublica report from the time, that distance didn’t fully stop the state’s Democratic Party from influencing the process.

Still, in many other states, legislatures are in charge of redrawing the maps, which makes the process much more explicitly partisan.

Continue reading the main story

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Ms. MacDonald said that this time around, she doesn’t know exactly how a new commission will tackle its task.

They’ll have their work cut out for them. It’ll be tough to accurately account for those displaced by fire. And some regions, like the Inland Empire, have gained residents forced to leave more expensive urban areas, like Los Angeles, shifting the distribution of residents around the state.

In any case, Ms. MacDonald said, even speculating about what a new map might look like is impossible.

“I could make a lot of money if I knew,” she said.

[Read The Times’s editorial board’s argument for making the House more representative.]

Continue reading the main story

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Here’s what else we’re following

We often link to sites that limit access for nonsubscribers. We appreciate your reading Times coverage, but we also encourage you to support local news if you can.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
  • Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed the articles of impeachment on Wednesday, crossing, as she put it, “a very important threshold in American history.” [The New York Times]
  • Ms. Pelosi also tapped seven lawmakers as impeachment managers, including two of her colleagues from California. Read more about Representative Zoe Lofgren, and Representative Adam Schiff.
  • “That an Iraqi-American Muslim immigrant was used as a pretext for military action in the Middle East is ironic.” In Sacramento, Muslim immigrants have been left grieving and on edge after the death of Nawres Waleed Hamid. [The New York Times]
  • Following California’s new law, more than two dozen states are set to talk about allowing college athletes to profit from their work and fame. [The New York Times]
  • New emails show that U.S.C. solicited donations from Lori Loughlin and her husband, offering special treatment for their daughter’s application, even as the couple conspired to bribe her way in, prosecutors say. [The New York Times]
  • The past decade was the hottest on record and 2019 was the second-hottest year ever. [The New York Times]
  • And in the face of climate change, the U.S. can’t afford the kind of costly delays that have become normal in big infrastructure projects. (See California’s high-speed rail.) [MIT Technology Review]
  • Why did a plane departing LAX dump jet fuel over an elementary school? [The New York Times]
  • Home surveillance footage caught five mountain lions together in Amador County. They typically live solitary lives, so it was a rare sight. [KTXL]
  • The star conductor Gustavo Dudamel extended his contract as music and artistic director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic. [The New York Times]

And Finally …

Companies ask users for more personal details before giving them their data to guard against giving it to the wrong person. Pau Barrena/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Recently, I was cleaning out a closet and stumbled across my old, white brick of an iPod. Firing it up — yes, I also kept the charging cord — was a nostalgia trip. (“Take Me Out,” anyone?)

My brush with the technology of yore reminded me how little of my favorite music I’d be able to listen to and how few of my favorite movies I’d be able to watch today without streaming services. I also couldn’t remember the last time I backed up the photos from my iCloud to an external hard drive.

If any of that sounds familiar to you, or you’re simply looking for ways to be less reliant on companies that are hoovering up your personal information, my colleague Brian X. Chen wrote about how to maintain your own backups.

California Today goes live at 6:30 a.m. Pacific time weekdays. Tell us what you want to see: CAtoday@nytimes.com. Were you forwarded this email? Sign up for California Today here.

Jill Cowan grew up in Orange County, graduated from U.C. Berkeley and has reported all over the state, including the Bay Area, Bakersfield and Los Angeles — but she always wants to see more. Follow along here or on Twitter, @jillcowan.

California Today is edited by Julie Bloom, who grew up in Los Angeles and graduated from U.C. Berkeley.

Continue reading the main story

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for California Today from The New York Times.

To stop receiving California Today, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings. To opt out of updates and offers sent from The Athletic, submit a request.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018